Free Audio Bible Download

I wanted to post this resource for you. It is a great audio bible that I just turn on and have it play through the day. It is free, you can also put it onto your iPod or play it on your computer. What better way could there be to create the right atmosphere in your home than to have the Scriptures playing continually.

http://www.faithcomesbyhearing.com/ambassador/free-audio-bible-download

Historians Speak Honestly About the ‘Trinity’

James Hastings: “It has been customary to trace the institution of the practice to the Words of Christ in Matthew 28:19, but the authenticity of this passage has been challenged on historical as well as textural grounds. It must be acknowledged that the formula of the threefold name, which is here enjoined, does not appear to have been used by the primitive church, which so far as our information goes, baptized ‘in’ or ‘into’ the Name of Jesus, or Jesus Christ, or the Lord Jesus, without any reference to the Father or the Spirit” (Dictionary of the Bible, p. 88).

Scribners: “The original form of words were into the Name of Jesus Christ or Lord Jesus. Baptism into Trinity was a later development” (Dictionary of the Bible, Vol. I, p. 241).

Canney Encyclopaedia: “The early church always baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus until the development of the Trinity; afterward they were baptized in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost” (p. 53).

American Encyclopaedia, International Edition: “The term Trinity was used by Theophilus of Antioch in AD 180″ (Vol. 27, p. 116).

Encyclopaedia Britannica: “The triune and Trinity formula was not uniformly used from the beginning, and up until the third century, baptism in the Name of Christ only was so widespread that Pope Stephen, in opposition to St. Cyprian, said that baptism in the Name of Christ was valid. But Catholic missionaries, by omitting one or more persons of the Trinity when they were baptized, were anathematized by the Roman church. Now the formula of Rome is, “I baptize thee in the name of the Father, and in the name of the Son and in the name of the Holy Ghost” (11th Ed., Vol. 3, p. 365-366).

Encyclopedia of Religions: “Persons were baptized at first in the Name of Jesus Christ, or ‘in the Name of the Lord Jesus.’ Afterwards, with the development of the doctrine of the Trinity, they were baptized in the Name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost” (p. 53).

New International Encyclopaedia: “The Trinity doctrine. The Catholic faith is this: ‘We worship one in Trinity, but there is one person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Ghost. The glory equal—the majesty co-eternal.’ The doctrine is not found in its fully developed form in the Scriptures. Modern theology does not seek to find it in the Old Testament. At the time of the Reformation, the Protestant Church took over the doctrine of the Trinity without serious examination” (Vol. 22, p. 476).

Hastings Encyclopedia of Religion: “Christian baptism was administered by using the words ‘in the Name of Jesus.’ The use of a Trinity formula of any sort was not suggested in the early Church history. Baptism was always in the Name of the Lord Jesus until the time of Justin Martyr when the Triune formula was used” (Vol. 2, p. 377-378, 389. )

“NAME was an ancient synonym for “Person.” Payment was always made in the name of some person referring to ownership. Therefore one being baptized in Jesus’ Name became His personal property. “Ye are Christ’s.” (Acts 1:15; Revelation 3:4; I Corinthians 3:23).

LIFE Magazine: “The Catholics made this statement concerning their doctrine of the Trinity to defend the dogma of the assumption of Mary in an article by Graham Green: ‘Our opponents sometimes claim that no belief should be held dogmatically which is not explicitly stated in the Scripture but the Protestant churches have themselves accepted such dogma as the Trinity for which there exists no such authority in the Gospels’” (October 30, 1950, Vol. 29, Number 18, p. 51).

Catholic Encyclopaedia: “The true doctrine of the sacrament of baptism is not taught by the Roman church. Baptism given by heretics in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost with the intention of performing what the church performs, is not true baptism” (Vol. 2, p. 259).

New Catholic Encyclopedia: “With regard to the form used for Baptism in the early church, there is the difficulty that although Matthew (28:19) speaks of the Trinitarian formula, which is now used, the Acts of the Apostles (2:38; 8:16; 10:48; 19:5) and Paul (I Corinthians 1:13; 6:11; Galatians 3:27; Romans 6:3) speak only of Baptism ‘in the Name of Jesus.’ Baptism in titles cannot be found in the first centuries. . .” (McGraw Hill Publishing, p. 59).

William Phillips Hall: “In this very ancient version (Syriac Peschito Version) which is believed by good authorities (Gwilliam, Boners, and others) to represent a text much older that of the Greek manuscript from which our English Old Testament was largely derived, ‘The Name of the Lord Jesus Messiah or Christ’ appears in all four readings given (Acts 2:38; 8:16; 10:48; 19:5)” (A Remarkable Discovery, p. 70).

International Encyclopaedia: “The doctrine of the Trinity did not form part of the Apostles’ preachings, as this is reported in the New Testament” (First Edition, Vol. 18, p. 226).

New International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: “The term ‘Trinity’ was originated by . . . Tertulian, a Roman Catholic church father. No record of the Trinitarian formula can be discovered in the Acts of the Apostles. . . At the time of the Reformation, the Protestant Church took over the doctrine of the Trinity without serious examination” (Vol. 1, p. 396).

“Because the Trinity is such an important part of later Christian doctrine, it is striking that the term does not appear in the New Testament. Likewise, the developed concept of three coequal partners in the Godhead found in later creedal formulations cannot be clearly detected within the confines of the canon.” “Trinity,” in The Oxford Companion to the Bible, Oxford University Press, 1993, p. 782.

“The adoption of a non-biblical phrase at Nicea constituted a landmark in the growth of dogma; the Trinity is true, since the Church — the universal Church speaking by its Bishops — says so, though the Bible does not! We have a formula, but what does that formula contain? No child of the Church dare seek to answer.” “Dogma, Dogmatic Theology,” in Encyclopedia

Pastor Must Marry a Virgin?

This was an exchange that I had with a brother on a discussion board. I didn’t put in his name or the moderators name because this is not a situation to call any names. Plus, I believe God is working with all of us and we can be wrong or in error in certain cases and the Holy Spirit will correct and convict us. I do not condemn the man or any other brother that holds to this view. So don’t get me wrong in any of what I say. My point is that this is a dangerous doctrine and it leads to dangerous results. The worst result is that a sister in the Lord is continuously reminded of her sin that is not even in the remembrance of God himself. This is an attribute of demons to bring back a persons forgiven sin. Secondly it could take a brother who would be used of the Lord out of the ministry when God intends to use him in some way.

Moderator: I would want to know what the saints think about a minister who marry a no-virgin…..

(LEVITICUS 21:7) “they shall not take a wife who is a harlot or a defiled woman,nor shall they take a woman divorced from her husband;for the priest is holy to his God”

(EZEKIEL 44:22)”they shall not take as wife a widow or a divorced woman,but take virgin of the descendants of the house of Israel,or widows of priests.”

According to those scriptures ,and as the prophet said about , what would be the case of a sister who have lost her virginity just by mistake as the world are doing today (boyfriend & girlfriend) can she still marry a minister

ANY QUOTATION OF THE PROPHET OR YOUR COMMENT, YOU ARE ALL WELCOME!!!

Jason DeMars: Yes, he sure can. This is OT. You must also list the other requirements of the priest. He must not have a skin blemish. He must not have a crushed stone.

All requirements for priests.

To summarize a priest must not perform funerals, have no skin blemish, not blind, not lame, no flat nose, no broken foot or hand, no crooked back, not a dwarf, no scabs or broken stones (Hebrew word for reproductive organ).

If you apply this then any pastor with a blemish in his skin or imperfect “stones” must leave the ministry.

Plus, if the woman is in Christ she is a new creation old things are passed away behold ALL things are become new. God does not even recognize that she was not a virgin, through Christ she has become a virgin again because her sin is in the sea of forgetfulness.

If someone would bring up that sin again they would be operating under the spirit of antichrist bringing back the sins of the sisters back in their face.

Jason DeMars: Also, would a pastor have to marry a Jewish woman? She must come from the “house of Israel”. All pastors are would then need to be disqualified except for those married to Jewish women.

Also, all believers are priests according to the apostle Peter, “ye are a royal priesthood.” Pastors are not priests any more than a sister in the church.

Message Believer Sorry bro. The prophet flat out said in Marriage and Divorce that a minister may not marry a widow. then he quoted this, and said the woman was a type of the Bride of Christ and was not to be touched by another man. For the minister handled the Fire of God! Also, the scripture on Women not wearing pants comes from the old testament. Not repeated in the NT. Yet we know what it means and that it still applies.

Jason DeMars It is an antichrist spirit that would bring up the sins of the past that people have committed.

Woman and man in wearing proper apparel does not equally equate to priest vs pastor. The modesty of men and women is referred to in the NT. wearing clothes that pertains to the opposite sex is called an abomination by God. This is a universal command pertaining to MORAL law. Christ did not do away with the moral law, he is writing it in our hearts. However, he fulfilled and thus did away with the ceremonial law. It is no longer a necessity. The priestly order is done away with, but in type all believers are priests, but within types you cannot apply the commandments to the type. would it therefore be true that you cannot be a believer in less you are married to a virgin. This is nonsense.

Look at the context of what bro. Branham was teaching. He was speaking of Christ and his church and then he quickly makes that statement you refer to. Should we create a doctrine out of one short statement said that has no biblical backing? I do not believe we should do that. It is not wise. If he only makes one statement about it how can we be sure that we are not misunderstanding. Are we back to catholicism that our pastors are considered priests?

Where does scripture say that a priest equates to a pastor? Brother, we all handle the fire of God, it is in every believers soul.

Message Believer: Sorry. Bro. Branham went in to detail about that in Marriage and Divorce. I know three times married preachers who use the same reasonings that you just quoted. And that is what they are, reasonings. More later, gotta roll and make some deliveries. God bless you.

Jason DeMars it is not my situation, but it is what I believe and stand for. there is nothing wrong with reasoning. God says in Isaiah 1:18, “Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.” God gave us reason for a purpose so that we might comprehend and understand complex issues, but he did not give it so that we could doubt or discredit or go against the Scriptures. Reason must be submitted to God and his Word in order to be used properly.

If my reasoning is not correct according to scripture please tell me, but please do not respond, bro. Branham said so. This is not a biblical reason. Just as when we explain to someone that Matthew 28:19 equates with Acts 2:38 we don’t say ‘Brother Branham said it” use that same standpoint with explaining this to me.

Message Believer: 10-4 on that good buddy. ( that is cb lingo from the 70′s. I just dated myself there) Never said a person can’t marry a non virgin, a minister can’t. And that matches the Word! Technically, by the Word, a divorced woman can not re-marry, period. She is to remain single, or be reconciled. I am not against reason that is subjected to the Word, (and a prophet is a divine interpreter of the Word) Bro. Branham emphatically said a minister can not marry widow. This was from a sermon that was given straight from God, with the kids in the grade school near the mountain were let out to go outside and see the fire of God descending and ascending from the mount. I think Bro. Branham knew what he was talking about when he said that. A woman is the type of the bride of Christ. She must not be touched by another man in this case because the priest, (type of the the pastor) handles the fire of God. Now if a man is not going to preach, and the women is not divorced, (and the man is not going through wives like some cases that are out there) then fine, get married. However, if he is a preacher, in a case like that, he better step down from the pulpit. Now, I agree, it has got to match the Bible. IT does! and the prophet explained how. If you still don’t agree, then that is fine. By the way, I don’t have an anti-Christ spirit. So please check your spirit before you go saying that. God bless you. p.s. Thank God for delete buttons. you won’t believe all the typos I had to correct before posting this. lol!

Jason DeMars So a pastor must marry a virgin of the daughter of the house of Israel?

Message Believer: Brother, if you can’t understand it after what the prophet said, and after what I just explained, then have a good day.

Jason DeMars: You gave no biblical explanation. You pretty much responded ‘brother Branham said so’ after I asked for scripture for it. In the NT the only qualification of an overseer marriage wise is that he should be the husband of one wife. Why did Paul leave out this important fact he needs to be the husband of one wife who is a virgin?

The quote you are talking about tells me simply that Christ as a type of the OT priest must be married to a virgin. The same applies to us as it does to a woman. We are not born virgins (spiritually) but are contaminated with sin and evil. Then we are born of the Spirit and are new creations in Christ old things have passed away and we become a virgin to the word.

The quote does not lead me to the un-scriptural understanding that a preacher must be married to a virgin.

Why Did God Say “Let Us”?

Here is a question from a brother in Christ.

Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Why did God speak in the plural when He made man?

A_SUPER_SIGN  JEFF_IN 12-27-59 Morning

26 That’s a sign, that every unrepented sinner will perish in the judgment, that the righteous shall be saved by the mercy of God. He gave another sign at the burning bush. What was it when He caught His runaway prophet? “I have heard the cries of My people, and I’ve remembered My covenant”? He gave another sign there, that He was a covenant-keeping God, that He remembered everything that He said, every promise that He made. He gave a sign at the burning bush, “And I’ve come down to deliver them.” Watch God in His ways of work. When He created the heavens and earth, He called the Angels together, and He said, “Let us.” Every place in the Scripture where He did anything mostly, “Not Me, but My Father.” But when it come to the plan of redemption, He came alone; nobody was with Him. He was the only One that could come. An Angel couldn’t do it. Another man called His son, couldn’t do it. One called something else, a holy virgin, or a holy mother, or–or some saint, couldn’t do it. God had to come.

He was speaking to angels because he desired their participation in his work. First of all notice that after God says, “let us” first and then the scripture says in verse 27, “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” 
See that Moses used the SINGULAR personal pronouns “HIS own image” “image of God created HE him, male and female created HE them.” 
So the plural pronoun by definition means he was speaking to someone who WAS NOT HIMSELF, ie not God. God is ONE person as evidenced by the THOUSANDS of scriptures that use singular personal pronouns. In this verse it clearly shows that he was speaking to someone OTHER than himself. 
A great example of this is in Isaiah 6. 

6Then flew one of the seraphims unto me, having a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with the tongs from off the altar:

7And he laid it upon my mouth, and said, Lo, this hath touched thy lips; and thine iniquity is taken away, and thy sin purged.

8Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, Here am I; send me.

God is speaking to the angelic beings surrounding his throne. He says whom shall I (singular pronoun pointing to ONE PERSON) send and whom shall go for US (the singular PERSON was speaking to the angelic beings who were NOT him).

Is there Death in the Millennium?

This is also from a discussion I had with several believers on a discussion board on Facebook.

I believe that the scriptures are not at all being unclear right there. There may or may not be a quote for it, but there is very, very clear scripture that says there is a sinner and that there is death in the millennium. This may sound like a foolish idea, but based upon the Isaiah 65 we understand that the “sinner dying at 100 years old shall be accursed.” Sin and death are there.

THE_SIXFOLD_PURPOSE_OF_THE_VISITATION_OF_GABRIEL JEFF_IN 07-30-61 Evening
Now, anyone, any reader that knows that from Ezekiel the 40th chapter until about the 44th chapter is nothing in the world but the millennium Temple being erected on earth (anyone knows that. See?), when the glory of the Lord fills it and so forth like that. 

Read a few of these scriptures in Ezekiel 40 to 44. 

Eze 44:22 Neither shall they take for their wives a widow, nor her that is put away: but they shall take maidens of the seed of the house of Israel, or a widow that had a priest before. 

Eze 44:25 And they shall come at no dead person to defile themselves: but for father, or for mother, or for son, or for daughter, for brother, or for sister that hath had no husband, they may defile themselves. 

Eze 44:27 And in the day that he goeth into the sanctuary, unto the inner court, to minister in the sanctuary, he shall offer his sin offering, saith the Lord GOD. 

These things take place during the millennium we can see that there is:

1. death (ie-dead person, widows)
2. sin (ie-divorce “her that is put away”, sin offerings)
3. sacrifice (ie-priests, “sin offering”)
4. marriage (widows, “not take for their wives”)

The word there in Isaiah 65:20 for die in Hebrew is “muth” and it means death, dead, destroy, kill or slay. 

Another point to be made about the millennium is that according to Isaiah 65:20 there will be children there. 

Isa 11:6 The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and A LITTLE CHILD shall lead them. 
Isa 11:7 And the cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together: and the lion shall eat straw like the ox. 
Isa 11:8 And the SUCKLING CHILD shall play on the hole of the asp, and the WEANED CHILD shall put his hand on the cockatrice’ den. 

There will be nursing and weaning and thus birth during the millennium. Clearly the children of the resurrection will not marry nor be given in marriage, but shall be like the angels of heaven. But those who are carried over in the ark so to speak from the time of Jacob’s trouble into the kingdom age will be able to do so. The saints will rule over the nations in that time. 

It also states that there are people that survive the day of the Lord and will come up to Jerusalem to worship at the temple of the Lord. 

Zec 14:9 And the LORD shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD, and his name one. 
Zec 14:10 All the land shall be turned as a plain from Geba to Rimmon south of Jerusalem: and it shall be lifted up, and inhabited in her place, from Benjamin’s gate unto the place of the first gate, unto the corner gate, and from the tower of Hananeel unto the king’s winepresses. 
Zec 14:11 And men shall dwell in it, and there shall be no more utter destruction; but Jerusalem shall be safely inhabited. 
Zec 14:12 And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth. 
Zec 14:13 And it shall come to pass in that day, that a great tumult from the LORD shall be among them; and they shall lay hold every one on the hand of his neighbour, and his hand shall rise up against the hand of his neighbour. 
Zec 14:14 And Judah also shall fight at Jerusalem; and the wealth of all the heathen round about shall be gathered together, gold, and silver, and apparel, in great abundance. 
Zec 14:15 And so shall be the plague of the horse, of the mule, of the camel, and of the ass, and of all the beasts that shall be in these tents, as this plague. 
Zec 14:16 And it shall come to pass, that EVERY ONE THAT IS LEFT of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles.

Isaiah 65:20 There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his days: for the child shall die an hundredyears old; but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.” A brother wrote in regards to this verse, ”Maybe it is because they are in hell…” The context of this verse is not at all speaking of hell. Why would they speak of age in regards to someone in hell? The context of the verse is the millennium not hell. 

No one is raised from the dead to live in the millennium because it is appointed unto man once to die and after that the judgment. Unless they are believers they will not be raised from the dead for a “second chance” to accept God.  These are people that survive armageddon and the catastrophic judgment God brings upon mankind. 

Zec 14:16 And it shall come to pass, that EVERY ONE THAT IS LEFT of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles. 

This scripture is speaking of Armageddon when all the nations of the earth will be gathered together against Jerusalem and the Jewish nation. Then it goes directly into the millennial reign of Christ. People are left or in other words they survive armageddon and they repopulate the earth as Noah and his family that was carried over in the ark. 

Take a look at this scripture speaking of the judgment before the millennium. It first says the Lord will make the earth empty and lay it waste and finishes with the statement there will be FEW men left. As in he destroys almost all people, but there are some people that survive. 

Isaiah 24:1 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty, and maketh it waste, and turneth it upside down, and scattereth abroad the inhabitants thereof.

2And it shall be, as with the people, so with the priest; as with the servant, so with his master; as with the maid, so with her mistress; as with the buyer, so with the seller; as with the lender, so with the borrower; as with the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him.

3The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD hath spoken this word.

4The earth mourneth and fadeth away, the world languisheth and fadeth away, the haughty people of the earth do languish.

5The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof; because they have transgressed the laws, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant.

6Therefore hath the curse devoured the earth, and they that dwell therein are desolate: therefore the inhabitants of the earth are burned, and FEW MEN LEFT.

Based upon what William Branham said and the scriptures that apply to it, we are given a clue as to various things that happen during the millennial reign of Jesus Christ upon the throne of David

What Are You Looking Forward To?

For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he: Eat and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart is not with thee. (Proverbs 23:7, King James Version)

This is an awesome truth. As a man thinks in his heart so is he. The popular saying goes, ‘you are what you eat” and while that may be true here we understand that “you are what you think.” This is very powerful. Whatever you think you are that is what you are.

How important is it then for us to be in control of what we are thinking? Sometimes we forget that all around us there is a battle taking place in another dimension over our life and eternal destination. There are angelic beings and demons fighting over us. These demons will speak things into our mind. When something vile or filthy enters our head we tend to identify that it is our thought. When this takes place we need to quickly recognize that a battle is about to ensue. A demon has spoke something to us and we can’t identify with it. We have to fight against it.

How do we fight against those thoughts?

We take the Scriptures that we have hidden in our heart (you have memorized scripture right?) and speak it back to the demon. We live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.

With that said, what is occupying your thought life? What are you looking forward to?

I find that in my own life I’m looking forward to some circumstance taking place. I very much would love to be able to work from home and spend more time with my family, but sometimes I look forward to that so much that I get obsessed with finding the way to do it and spending so much time on that and when it doesn’t happen overnight I’m so disappointed and frustrated. Then I tend to get upset and depressed about it.

Instead of letting those things occupy my mind the things that need to occupy my mind are the things of God and how can I serve Him and others right now and not chasing something that is ahead. If I serve Him today and seek Him FIRST and let Christ be my dominate thought he will give me the desires of my heart.

Delight thyself also in the LORD: and he shall give thee the desires of thine heart. (Psalm 37:4, King James Version)

If my thoughts are dominated by delight in the LORD God and I seek after His kingdom and His righteousness the desires of my heart will be fulfilled. Unfortunately when the desires of our heart are set on things that are temporal you won’t receive those desires. If your mind and your desire is focused on the delight that comes from God alone then those desires can and will be fulfilled. See many of our desires are short sighted. We want bigger houses, nicer cars, a better cell phone, a newer laptop or a different job when eternal delight is right before us in the person of God.

So my thoughts need to be on God and not on myself. When my thoughts are on God then if that desire is truly from Him to work at home and spend more time with my family it will come to pass. If that desire isn’t from Him then guess what? That desire will slip away and I will find my contentment in Him. My desires will be quenched by the unsearchable riches of Christ.

My prayer as you read this post is that the Holy Spirit would search your heart and reveal to you the places that need to come under the gentle yoke of Christ.

Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ; (2 Corinthians 10:5, King James Version)

Make sure to subscribe to our updates via email and if you have enjoyed this post, have questions or thoughts to add please comment below.

Jason DeMars

Stick with the Bible

Preach the Gospel

I have a deep burden in my heart to see the gospel preached here in America amongst and through believers of the end-time message. Here is the reason I have this burden.

I have seen and heard of many people being so disturbed because someone presented them with William Branham and his ministry. They say something like, “the worship William Branham” or “they are exalting a man.” What a reproach this brings upon the word of God!

What happened to following William Branham’s example and preaching the same gospel that he did. Not just a powerless presentation of the powerful ministry of William Branham, but preaching the gospel with signs following. When I say the gospel I mean, the apostolic fathers’ faith, the original faith preached by the apostle Paul. I’m talking about water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ, the oneness of the Godhead, the work of the Holy Spirit, the blood of Christ, sanctification of the Spirit, holiness living and salvation by faith alone. The mysteries of the scriptures are important, but people need to hear the original faith and gospel. I am seriously in prayer that the Lord would raise up a generation of brothers that would preach the word and not preach quotes of God’s servant or about the miracles of God’s servant.

As glorious and wonderful as the ministry of brother Branham was we are never called to lift up a man. We are called testify of God’s work, but not before we testify of the real true gospel of the bible and Jesus Christ. My hope is there would be a group of men raised up to preach out of the scriptures and not a bunch of quotes and statements piecemealed together. The gospel (that is the good news that Jesus is Lord and Christ, that he has raised from the dead and that through his name there is remission of sins) comes not in word only but in power and demonstration of the Spirit that faith might be in God and not in the words of men.

My hope is that the saints in America would be revived to this and would go out in our local areas and present the truth we have been restored to in a scriptural means and not as the seven sons of Sceva who said, “we adjure thee in the name of Jesus whom Paul preaches.” Many times that is what we do as we preach, “bro. Branham said this out of the bible and bro. Branham taught that out of the bible.” PREACH THE WORD!

I pray the Lord helps us all!

The Bible is THE Absolute

What is God Doing Today?

Is there a living God that speaks, works miracles, and manifests himself TODAY, or is

that a thing of the past or is it simply a myth?

Are you sensing there is more to biblical truth than what you are experiencing right now?

There is a message that God has sent to this generation!

The answer to these questions is in the Scriptures and that is what I stand for in this ministry. He is calling his people back to the bible and the apostolic faith. He hasn’t simply left it up to us to figure it out. He sent a ministry and vindicated His presence with it. So let’s go back to the Bible. I’m not standing for my own thoughts or ideas, but the teachings of the Scriptures, pure and simple without the interpretations, creeds and historical confessions of the church.

Please read through and find out more. But don’t just come to this site to read the articles. Get in contact with me! I’d love to hear your questions and talk with you about what Christ is doing today.

“Wherefore I will not be negligent to put you always in remembrance of these things, though ye know them, and be established in the present truth.” 2 Peter 1:12

Through the Holy Spirit we have been given the apostolic understanding of the Godhead, water baptism, the original sin, the new birth, holiness, predestination and the spiritual gifts operating in the body of Christ.

Next Page »